Today (27th), 沈陽 Internet court on the plaintiff 沈陽 a network company v. defendant a 沈陽 a network company, defendant two Tencent company infringement works information network communication rights disputes two cases of online first public announcement 軟件 customization

Judging that the case was the first time that Tencent was sued as a 微信小程序 service provider. Because of the many similar cases caused by the infringement of 微信小程序, the first sentence also caused a high degree of concern for the “people who eat melons”.

小程序內容屢屢侵權 連帶責任怎么擔？

小程序 is a new format in the field of mobile Internet in recent years. Tencent provides basic services for architecture and access to 小程序 developers, and provides underlying technical support services for 小程序 operation through 微信.

"This case is the first case that Tencent was sued as a 微信小程序 service provider. Since its official release in early 2017, 微信小程序 has been built, released, and has the advantage of being used and 小程序's own community attributes at 微信. Rapid development in the ecology. When copyright infringement occurs in 小程序 content running on 微信, does Tencent apply the 'notification to delete' rule? The handling of this case has a certain typical significance." The trial judge said that the defendant registered and developed on Tencent's 微信 微信小程序, without the plaintiff's permission, spread the plaintiff's right to disseminate information on the Internet in 小程序. "The original tells the defendant to bear the tort liability. The defendant II is involved in the case of 小程序 and bears joint liability."

xx 騰訊雖無責 法官有話說

經審理，法院裁定被告賠償原告每箱經濟損失15,000元（包括合理的侵權侵權費用），并駁回原告對被告人Er Tencent的所有索賠。換句話說，騰訊不必承擔連帶責任。

但是，對于騰訊作為基本網絡服務提供商的情況，法官還表示，雖然騰訊在這種情況下不適用于“刪除通知”規則，但它沒有任何法律義務。 “一方面，根據《中華人民共和國網絡安全法》，它不僅有義務在國家安全等刑事犯罪方面協助執法，還積極審查色情，恐怖，賭博等非法和非法信息，發現禁止發布法律，行政法規或者發送信息應立即技術上可行，以阻止信息傳遞;另一方面，騰訊應對小程序開發者的主要進行實名認證和發布。機構信息確保權利人能夠有效，及時地維護權利。騰訊應依靠科學合理的管理機制，知識產權保護機制和紀律機制，在權利保護與技術中立之間保持一定的平衡，共同維護網絡尊重知識分子的環境和競爭秩序他人的財產權。“

[來源：新藍網]